Analysis Of Mary Coleridge's The Witch
Modern depictions of witches range from highschool teenagers as in the 2018 Netflix adaptation The Chilling Adventures Of Sabrina, to even faux sitcom housewives as in the 2021 Marvel superhero show Wandavision. Imagery of witches living some part of their lives as normal women may reflect a more accurate depiction of what witches originally were. Our understanding of witches today has long been warped from their original position in society. Early women who were experts in medicine and healing were slandered by patriarchal institutions in order to give validity towards their educational institutions. “The evolution of European universities…systematically excluded women as students, thereby creating a legal male monopoly of the practice of medicine.” (Women Healers of The Middle Ages: Selected Aspects of Their History, William L. Minkowski) Women experts in pagan or esoteric traditions and medicines were deemed illegal, and considered a threat to the church's power. Thus “the result was the brutal execution of unknown numbers of mostly peasant women.” (Minkowski) Such documents like the Malleus Maleficarum, a witch hunting manual published in 1486 reflect the effects of the European church's vilification of witches. Almost 300 years later the Salem Witch trials in the 18th century continued to demonstrate this violent fear of witches, and what they represented. ‘Witches’ were something that always existed outside of the standards of patriarchal society.
The symbol of women wise in the nature of the world, educated in ways beyond the imposed reach of the church was invalidated by turning the concept of a wise woman into something horrifying. In an analysis of the Malleus Maleficarum, Peter Brodel writes “They accept as an established fact that the gaze of certain persons – menstruating women for example – has a natural power capable of bringing about physical effects, and that in some angry or disturbed old women this gaze may be sufficient to do real harm to young and impressionable minds and bodies.” (The Malleus Maleficarum and the Construction of Witchcraft, Peter Brodel) Indeed, the very nature of womanhood itself was transformed into a malignant evil associated with dark powers.
As the hallmarks of what made a woman a witch became more general, so too did the kinds of evil acts they were capable of. The authors of the Malleus Maleficarum wrote that although random unfortunate events can have plausible explanations, if a witch was present then it was most likely caused by their evil workings. “Where there are witches, a category that is inevitably socially defined, there must be witchcraft…This link between moral behavior and ambiguous harm, allows the authors to extend their conception of witchcraft to an almost limitless number of applications.” (The Malleus Maleficarum and the Construction Of Witchcraft, Hans Peter Brodel) The word ‘witch’ became an ambiguous descriptor condemning any women who appeared to resist the patriarchal standards European institutions imposed. By the 19th century, Mary Elizabeth Coleridge wrote The Witch, a poem which reappropriates the ambiguity of witches in order to express a freer conception of womanhood compared to what contemporary social standards would have allowed.
This poem was originally published in Fancy’s Following (1891) by Coleridge under the pseudonym Anodos, referencing a literary character known for his wandering about a strange new world, from a 19th century novel by another author titled Phantastes. (1858) Mary Coleridge used a pseudonym largely because of the legacy her great great uncle Samuel Coleridge had created for the family name. A collection of various works, diary entries, and letters of Mary Coleridge along with a memoir was published after her death by her friend Edith Sichel. In `Gathered Leaves,` Sichel says Coleridge had thought '‘I have no fairy godmother’ she once wrote ‘but lay claim to a fairy great-great-uncle.” (Pg. 11, Gathered Leaves) This acknowledgment of the standard set forth for the family name by her great-great-uncle Samuel through his highly celebrated work reflects how his own writings may have influenced the kind of imagery Mary Coleridge utilized in her own poetry.
Coleridge creates a witch through using imagery and symbolism historically associated with them. The poem in essence reflects the story of a wanderer made weak from a long journey, seeking refuge. The first speaker has “walked a great while over snow” (Line 1) and has “wandered all over this fruitful earth” (Line 5) implying something wayward about them. The wayward woman, traveling to and from strange and distant lands has historically been associated with witchy behavior. The three sisters in Shakespeare’s play Macbeth, disputed as weird or wayward, sometimes both were noted on by Samuel Coleridge, “Their character consists in the imaginative disconnected from the good; they are the shadowy obscure and fearfully anomalous of physical nature, the lawless of human nature, —elemental evenagers with no sex or kin.” (Collection of Coleridge's Essays and Lectures On Shakespeare, 1907) Mary Coleridge adopts this elemental, transient nature of witches, but challenges this through repeatedly establishing the speaker's female identity. This speaker isn’t “tall or strong,” (Line 2) and is just a “little maiden” (Line 12) with “little white feet.” (Line 13) The witch Coleridge creates is not a sexless shadow in command of wind and rain, but a small maiden who suffers from the effects of a long journey and cold weather. Coleridge characterizes a witch solely based on her moral actions, specifically being a woman who wanders the world independently. The reader associates the cold snow and harsh wind with her powers because of the historically ingrained cultural connection between a woman's moral behavior and ambiguous harm.
Coleridge emphasizes her focus on the ambiguity between witches and womanhood through using the word ‘witch’ in the title, and nowhere else in the poem. Neither speaker refers to each other as being the titular witch the title might be referring to, calling the reader to label one of the speakers as being the witch themselves. Coleridge manages to disrupt this reading through the third stanza, which alternates to the perspective of the second speaker in the poem, the one who listens from the otherside of the threshold. This speaker talks in the past tense, suggesting that whatever had been implied by the entry of the first speaker, the second has lived to tell this story as it happened. The first speaker had done no harm, however the most notable change upon her entry was that the “quivering flame sunk and died in the fire.” (Lines 17, 18) And they continue to say that “It never was lit again on my hearth.” (Line 19) The imagery of fire on the hearth draws back to the connection between witches and their believed elemental powers. However it seems as though Coleridge is actually disarming the connection between the supernatural and the nature of womanhood with these lines. Mary Coleridge’s poem draws striking similarities to a famous poem by Samul Coleridge, called Christabel, (1816) which may hold the key to understanding this final stanza.
Samuel Coleridge's poem Christabel is about a woman who invites a stranger into her home, and upon her entry strange things begin to take place giving way to exposing something supernatural about the stranger. One of the supernatural effects of the visitor's entry was dying flames suddenly burning bright again.
“The brands were flat, the brands were dying,
Amid their own white ashes lying;
But when the lady passed, there came
A tongue of light, a fit of flame” (Christabel, Samuel Coleridge, 1816)
After Christabel finds this stranger in the woods and invites them into her home, she sees the stranger walk past dying embers burning in torches on the wall, and they suddenly flourish into full flames again. In Mary Coleridge's poem however, the stranger's entry is signaled by a dying flame going out completely, and never spontaneously bursting back to life in the presence of this stranger. There is nothing supernatural about this ‘witch,’ and through taking her power away, Coleridge reverts her back to the woman she really is.
Her poem utilizes the vague associations already placed within readers' minds in order to play with their expectations, and disarm the connection patriarchal societies have made between women and the world. The Witch is a reminder that while we may wish to hide behind our thresholds and not let the stranger in, we must remove ourselves from what we believe our fears are so we can help people by lifting them over the threshold and letting them into our world. It is through lack of curiosity towards what we do not understand that we erase the possibility of what could exist. If we continue to believe that witches are something scary, we will continue to leave people in the cold. Mary Coleridge challenges this fear through using cultural iconography formerly used as evidence to condemn women to reflect the absurdity of those claims.